KASBAH is an idea for a
research project, with the ultimate aim of bettering the lives of otters
in captivity.
Animals In Captivity
"A short life in the Wild is better than a long life in
captivity."
"Of course they're happy, or they wouldn't breed."
Two entirely opposing views, both held by equally intelligent,
compassionate people. Is either view the truth? Or neither? How do we
determine the truth?
Firstly, we have to define what a "happy" animal is. One of
the pitfalls in doing this is that we ascribe to animals all the feelings
that a human would have in their position - or none of them! Both extremes
are unrealistic.
Today, on the whole, public and media opinion tends towards the belief
that "The Wild" is a kind of animal paradise, and that all
captive animals yearn to be "set free". Is there any truth in
this, or is it a philosophical world view, a matter of spiritual belief
rather than objective fact? Is it in fact entirely anthropocentric,
"returning" animals to the wild to make ourselves feel virtuous
and able to look down on those who "force" animals to
"remain" in captivity?
Generally, world-wide (with honourable exceptions), animal keepers
display the opposite extreme of opinion. Animals are things, to be used
for whatever purpose people wish, devoid of feelings, and with only the
most basic needs. This too is entirely anthropocentric.
We also have to take into account the fact that although people have
been trying to "save" the rainforests, tigers and so on for at
least the last 30 years, rainforests (and tigers) are being destroyed in
"The Wild" at a tremendous rate. There are occasional successes,
but these often turn out to be temporary in the face of either the
understandable need of local people to survive, or the profits to be
gained by big business. Ironically, the rise of vegetarianism in the West
by ecologically minded people is itself contributing to the demise of
wildlife. Areas are logged to create Soya plantations, which are then
sprayed to increase yields with the resultant runoff and pollution of
watercourses.
My personal view is that animals are not humans - they do not share our
attitudes and aspirations, they are not people in furry suits, and
believing otherwise can actually lead to unintentional cruelty from the
best of motives. Neither are animals automata, following mechanical
programming. Animals are animals, with their own objectives and desires,
and each animal is an individual, with its own idiosyncrasies, memories,
tastes etc.
Over the years, talking to pet-owners, vets, farmers, conservationists,
keepers and other people who interact daily with animals, it seems to be
that many of them share this belief, though in some quarters it is not
usual to express it like this. But it is all still opinion, even though it
is backed up by experience. I lacked the facts to support or demolish my
view.
I also believe that if we abandon keeping animals in captivity, a great
many species will simply disappear, whereas if we have a healthy
population in enlightened captivity, at least we have the
option of returning them if circumstances allow. Examples of this are the
Arabian Oryx and the Przewalski's Wild Horse.
IUCN
View
Extinction, as someone once said, is forever.
Why I Wanted to Do Something About It
I visited as many collections as I could find that showed Otters. With the
Asian Short-Clawed Otter, Amblonyx cinereus, which is the most
commonly kept species, I was surprised by the variation in conditions,
from cement-floored pens 10' square to 60' paddocks with water, earth,
grass, gravel, rocks, indoor and outdoor shelters. Some otters looked
"happy" and others looked "miserable", but how could I
tell whether the latter were really suffering?
I needed to move the discussion from the realms of sentiment into
reality.
The Birth of KASBAH
I set myself to read as much literature as I could find as an ordinary
member of the public, and talk to as many animal professionals as
possible. In terms of species, in order to limit the task to manageable
proportions, I decided to look specifically at otters, but on a wider
basis at animal behavioural and welfare studies. After a while, it seemed
to me that whilst there were many studies on aspects of the situation,
there was not systematic synthesis of the results.
Since I work in IT, in a research laboratory (high energy physics,
lasers, computing, space science and so on - we do not have laboratory
animals), it came to me that a computer application could be built that
merged information about the animal in the wild with animal behavioural
data, along with factors that can be manipulated in captivity to create a
tool that would show how to make otters happy.
KASBAH as a Research Project
I spoke to various people at work - my Division Head, a behaviour
psychologist, an expert in Knowledge-Based-Systems, an expert in
heterogeneous databases, and they all agreed that from an IT perspective,
it could be done (although very challenging) and would be a small version
of a GRIDs project. This would be in the laboratory's interests as when
the DIAMOND synchrotron comes online, there will be a lot of work to which
the basis principles of my scheme could be applied. The Division decided
to support me in a part-time research degree to work on this project.
However, I knew I would not be interested enough to do pure IT
research. After talking to people who have PhDs and/or supervise research
students, I decided to approach, as a potential supervisor, Professor
Webster, at the Division of Animal Health and Husbandry, Department of
Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol. Professor Webster is
well known for work in animal welfare and ethics, and is the author of
" Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye towards Eden", so he was an ideal
person to understand what KASBAH was intended to do. He was interested,
and suggested Dr Mike Mendl as a co-supervisor; Dr Mendl is also
interested in animal behaviour with a view to improving animal welfare.
Why KASBAH?
The name just came one day, with the acronym complete. We had to work
harder on contriving the SOUKH engine though.
Do I Really Like Otters?
In other words, are Otters just my
"experimental animals"?
Well, when I see an otter, my first instinct is "Wh'os a woozy
foozy otterbaby den?"
So yes, I love otters in the soppiest, most sentimental way possible.
Very few people possess my cuteness tolerance, and otters are just so very
cute. I have otter soft toys, postcards, posters, ornaments, I video otter
programs, I play with Belinda and Bertie Otter, wiggling their little paws
and letting them crawl about on me and chew my clothes.
But I can, on occasion, rise above this and look at them as small
predators, going about their lawful occasions, and this is what I find so
very fascinating. Otters, no matter how tame, are always wild, far more so
than dogs or cats. You always interact with them on their terms - there is
no compromise.
Seeing an otter that (I think) is unhappy is - dreadful.
|